The "war on terror" has created a culture of fear in America. The Bush
administration's elevation of these three words into a national mantra since
the horrific events of 9/11 has had a pernicious impact on American
democracy, on America's psyche and on U.S. standing in the world. Using this
phrase has actually undermined our ability to effectively confront the real
challenges we face from fanatics who may use terrorism against us.
The damage these three words have done -- a classic self-inflicted wound --
is infinitely greater than any wild dreams entertained by the fanatical
perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks when they were plotting against us in
distant Afghan caves. The phrase itself is meaningless. It defines neither a
geographic context nor our presumed enemies. Terrorism is not an enemy but a
technique of warfare -- political intimidation through the killing of
unarmed non-combatants.
But the little secret here may be that the vagueness of the phrase was
deliberately (or instinctively) calculated by its sponsors. Constant
reference to a "war on terror" did accomplish one major objective: It
stimulated the emergence of a culture of fear. Fear obscures reason,
intensifies emotions and makes it easier for demagogic politicians to
mobilize the public on behalf of the policies they want to pursue. . . .
To justify the "war on terror," the administration has lately crafted a
false historical narrative that could even become a self-fulfilling
prophecy. By claiming that its war is similar to earlier U.S. struggles
against Nazism and then Stalinism (while ignoring the fact that both Nazi
Germany and Soviet Russia were first-rate military powers, a status al-Qaeda
neither has nor can achieve), the administration could be preparing the case
for war with Iran. . . .
Such fear-mongering, reinforced by security entrepreneurs, the mass media
and the entertainment industry, generates its own momentum. The terror
entrepreneurs, usually described as experts on terrorism, are necessarily
engaged in competition to justify their existence. . . .
The entertainment industry has also jumped into the act. Hence the TV
serials and films in which the evil characters have recognizable Arab
features, sometimes highlighted by religious gestures, that exploit public
anxiety and stimulate Islamophobia. Arab facial stereotypes, particularly in
newspaper cartoons, have at times been rendered in a manner sadly
reminiscent of the Nazi anti-Semitic campaigns. Lately, even some college
student organizations have become involved in such propagation, apparently
oblivious to the menacing connection between the stimulation of racial and
religious hatreds and the unleashing of the unprecedented crimes of the
Holocaust. . . .
Someday Americans will be as ashamed of this record as they now have become
of the earlier instances in U.S. history of panic by the many prompting
intolerance against the few.
In the meantime, the "war on terror" has gravely damaged the United States
internationally. . . .
Zbigniew Brzezinski, national security adviser to President Jimmy Carter, is
the author most recently of "Second Chance: Three Presidents and the Crisis
of American Superpower" (Basic Books).
The House Armed Services Committee is banishing the global war on terror
from the 2008 defense budget.--Rick Maze, "No more GWOT, House committee
decrees," Military Times, April 4, 2007
[In contrast to Tony Blair, the new British leader has offered no emotive
sound bites, no promises of tough new laws and no talk of a "war on terror"
since the failed attacks in London and Glasgow. . . . Brown has spoken of
"al-Qaida" attackers but not of "Islamic" or "Muslim" terrorists.--Jill
Lawless, "Britons
cheer Brown for attacks response," Associated Press, July 3, 2007]
[THE "global war on terror" is what America calls its response to the
September 11th attacks. Never mind the cliche, or the fact that "terrorism"
is a tactic and "terror" a state of mind--"Language
and terrorism: Don't mention the GWOT," Economist, July 5, 2007]
[Islamophobia should be as unacceptable as any other form of prejudice. When
255,000 members of the so-called "Christian community" signed a petition to
prevent the building of a large mosque in Abbey Mills, east London, they
sent a grim message to the Muslim world: western freedom of worship did not,
apparently, apply to Islam. There were similar protests by some in the
Jewish community, who, as Seth Freedman pointed out in his Commentisfree
piece, should be the first to protest against discrimination.--Karen
Armstrong, "An
inability to tolerate Islam contradicts western values," Guardian,
July 21, 2007]
[For one thing, there isn't actually any such thing as Islamofascism - it's
not an ideology; it's a figment of the neocon imagination. The term came
into vogue only because it was a way for Iraq hawks to gloss over the
awkward transition from pursuing Osama bin Laden, who attacked America, to
Saddam Hussein, who didn't.--Paul Krugman, "Inflating
the Threat of Radical Islam," New York Times, October 29, 2007]
[Let Islam be Islam. The United States possesses neither the capacity nor
the wisdom required to liberate the world's 1.4 billion Muslims, who just
might entertain their own ideas about what genuine freedom entails.--Andrew
J. Bacevich, "Picking up after failed war on
terror," Los Angeles Times, November 6, 2007]
[Religious intolerance marks one candidate debate after another - a sweeping
denigration of Islam. And it is going to backfire.--James Carroll, "Islamofascism's ill
political wind," Boston Globe, January 21, 2008]
[The Bush administration has never shied from playing the fear card to
distract the American public from scandal or goad them into supporting a
deeply flawed foreign policy. Here a history of the administration's
most-dubious terror alerts - including three consecutive Memorial Day
scare-a-thons - all of which proved far less terrifying than the screamer
headlines they inspired.--Tim Dickinson, "Truth
or Terrorism? The Real Story Behind Five Years of High Alerts,"
rollingstone.com, January 22, 2008]
[For those who see through the game, it is obvious that the personalization
trick covers up huge foreign policy fiascoes hatched by Washington and
London.--Sreeram Chaulia, "The
ever-changing faces of terror," Asia Times, February 8, 2008]
[The new director of national intelligence told Congress on Thursday that
global economic turmoil and the instability it could ignite had outpaced
terrorism as the most urgent threat facing the United States.--Mark
Mazzetti, "Global
Economy Top Threat to U.S., Spy Chief Says," New York Times,
February 13, 2009]
[The UK and the US have "actively undermined" international law in the way
they fight terrorism, . . .
The report remarks upon the extent to which undemocratic regimes with poor
human rights records have referred to counter-terror practices of countries
like the US to justify their own abusive policies.--"Anti-terror
tactics 'weaken law'," BBC News, February 16, 2009]
[A panel of experts set up by the International Commission of Jurists has
concluded that counterterrorism measures adopted after 9/11 "threaten the
very core of the international human rights framework." The panel's report,
called "Assessing Damage,
Urging Action," was released last week following a three-year study of
how tactics used in the so-called "war on terror" have eroded rights and
liberties the world over and created a climate of "lingering cynicism."--"Fmr. Irish President Mary
Robinson Heads Panel Faulting 'War on Terror' for Eroding Human
Rights," democracynow.org, February 25, 2009]
[ . . . just now Christian armies are busily annexing and wrecking
Afghanistan and Iraq, having recently bombed Somalia? That they use robotic
aircraft to murder Yemenis, that they hunt down Moslems in the Philippines
(where after 1898 Americans engaged in atrocities that would win the
admiration of the Japanese), encourage Israel to ruin Lebanon and to run a
concentration camp for Moslems in Gaza, enthusiastically murder Pakistanis
from the sky, and threaten Syria and Iran?
. . . I append here a list of all Christian countries conquered by militant
Moslems since 1529:
Next, a partial list of Moslem countries conquered by Christians: Morocco,
Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Sudan, Lebanon, Syria, Palestine, Jordan,
Iraq (the first time), Iraq (again), Iran, Pakistan, East Pakistan,
Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Yemen, Oman, Abu Dhabi, Dubai--Fred
Reed, "A
Requiem for Reason," fredoneverything.net, September 8, 2010]
[The bottom line answer is that the "war on terror" is about creating real
terrorists. The US government desperately needs real terrorists in order to
justify its expansion of its wars against Muslim countries and to keep the
American people sufficiently fearful that they continue to accept the police
state that provides "security from terrorists," but not from the government
that has discarded civil liberties.--Paul Craig Roberts, "The
War On Terror," antiwar.com, October 16, 2010]
[But who put up the money to send out all those millions of DVDs? . . .
Clarion, which has strong links to the right-wing Israeli group Aish HaTorah
and is listed in government records as a foreign nonprofit, would never
say.--Justin Elliott, "Mystery of who funded right-wing
'radical Islam' campaign deepens," salon.com, November 16, 2010