Barack Obama was elected with overwhelming approval to inaugurate an era of
change. And at his November 25 press conference, he said that his decisive
victory gave him a mandate to change the direction in which America is
moving. But his recent economic and foreign policy appointments make it
clear that when he chose "change" as his campaign slogan, he was NOT
referring to the financial, insurance and real estate (FIRE) sectors, nor to
foreign policy. These are where the vested interests concentrate their
wealth and power. And change already has been accelerating here.
Unfortunately, its direction has been for the top 1% of America's population
to raise their share of in the returns to wealth from 37% ten years ago to
57% five years ago and an estimated nearly 70% today.
The change that Mr. Obama is talking about is largely marginal to this
wealth, not touching its economic substance - or its direction. No doubt he
will bring about a welcome change in race relations, environmental
regulations, and a more civil rule of law. And he probably will give wage
earners an income-tax break (thereby enabling them to keep on paying their
bank debts, incidentally). As for the rich, they prefer not to earn income
in the first place. Taxes need to be paid on income, so they take their
returns in the form of capital gains. And simply avoiding losses is the
order of the day in the present meltdown.
Where losses cannot be avoided, the government will bail out the rich on
their financial investments, but not wage earners on their debts. On that
Friday night last October when Mr. Obama and Mr. McCain held their final
debate, Mr. Obama was fully on board with the bailouts. And this week's
appointment of the "Yeltsin" team who sponsored Russia's privatization
giveaways in the mid-1990s - Larry Summers and his proteges from the
Clinton's notorious Robert Rubin regime - shows that he knows his place when
it comes to the proper relationship between a political candidate and his
major backers. It is to protect the vested interests first of all, while
focusing voters' attention on policies whose main appeal is their ability to
distract attention from the fact that no real change is being made at the
economic core and its power relationships.
This is not what most people hoped for. But their hopes were so strong that
it was easier to indulge in happy dreams and put one's faith in a prince
than to look at the systemic problems that need to be restructured in order
for real change to occur. Individuals do not determine who owes what to
whom, who is employed by whom or what laws govern their work and investment.
Institutional economic and political structures are the key. And somehow the
focus has been on the politics of personalities, not on the economic forces
at work.
This is as true abroad as it is in the United States. Two weeks ago I was at
an economic meeting on "financialization" in Germany. Most of the attendees
with whom I spoke expressed the hope - indeed, almost a smug conviction -
that Obama would be like Gorbachev in Russia: a man who saw the need for
deep structural change but chose to bide his time, seeming to "play the
game" with the protective coloration of going along, but then introducing a
revolutionary reform program once in office.
Instead, after resembling President Carter by running a brilliant
presidential primary campaign to win the nomination (will a similarly
disappointing administration be about to come?), Obama is looking more like
Boris Yeltsin - a political umbrella for the kleptocrats to whom the public
domain and decades of public wealth were given with no quid pro quo.
Obama's ties with the Yeltsin administration are as direct as could be. He
has appointed as his economic advisors the same anti-labor, pro-financial
team that brought the kleptocrats to power in Russia in the mid-1990s. . . .
[US military leaders and Pentagon officials have made it clear through
public statements and deliberately leaked stories in recent weeks that they
plan to violate a central provision of the US-Iraq withdrawal agreement
requiring the complete withdrawal of all US combat troops from Iraqi cities
by mid-2009 by reclassifying combat troops as support troops.--Gareth
Porter, "US
Military Defiant on Key Terms of Iraqi Pact," antiwar.com, December
19, 2008]
[What is there to win in Afghanistan to justify doubling down our
investment? . . . did not America vote against Bush? Why is America getting
seamless continuity when it voted for significant change?--Patrick J.
Buchanan, "Obama's
War," antiwar.com, December 19, 2008]
[President Obama was a war criminal by his third day in office when he
ordered illegal cross-border drone attacks on Pakistan that murdered 20
people, including 3 children. The bombing and strafing of homes and villages
in Afghanistan by US forces and America's NATO puppets are also war crimes.
Obama cannot enforce the law, because he himself has already violated
it.--Paul Craig Roberts, "Where Principles
Go to Die: In America, Speaking the Truth is a Career-Ending Event,"
counterpunch.org, January 26, 2009]
[But there's been no exciting surprise or originality in Obama's opening
engagements with the reeling economy. His team is flush with economists and
bankers who helped blaze the path to ruin.--Alexander Cockburn, "Obama and the
Oddsmakers," counterpunch.org, January 30, 2009]
[But what lifted those reports last weekend out of the routine is the simple
fact that for the first time the air strikes occurred on President Obama's
watch. . . .
My heart sank. It absolutely sank. It had been very high. I had been, like I
think the rest of the country, feeling immensely encouraged and inspired by
this new administration and by the energy and vigor with which he began. And
then comes this piece of old stuff on approach to a complicated question
that in comes in the form of a bomb and a bomb in the most dangerous of all
places. And, yeah, my heart sank, literally.--"Bill
Moyer's Journal," pbs.org, January 30, 2009]
[President Obama doesn't want to hold Bush accountable for his crimes and
violations of the Constitution, because Obama wants to retain the powers
that Bush asserted. Even the practice of kidnapping people and transporting
them to foreign countries to be tortured has been retained by President
Obama.--Paul Craig Roberts, "From One Assault
on the Constitution to Another: Bill of Rights Under Fire,"
counterpunch.org, February 20, 2009]
[The Obama administration, like the Bush administration before it, claimed
national security would be compromised if a lawsuit brought by the Oregon
chapter of the charity, Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, was allowed to
proceed.--Devlin Barrett, "Court rejects Obama bid to stop wiretapping
suit," Washington Post, February 27, 2009]
[But however much Obama may differ from Bush on particulars, he appears
intent on sustaining the essentials on which the Bush policies were
grounded. Put simply, Obama's pragmatism poses no threat to the reigning
national security consensus.--Andrew J. Bacevich, "Obama's sins of omission,"
Boston Globe, April 25, 2009]
[Obama's Iraq plan is virtually identical to the one on Bush's table on
January 19, 2009. Obama has just rebranded the occupation, sold it to
liberals and dropped the term "Global War on Terror" while, for all
practical purposes, continuing the Bush era policy (that's why leading
Republicans praised Obama's plan). In the real world, US military commanders
have said they are preparing for an Iraq presence for another 15-20 years,
the US embassy is the size of Vatican City, there is no official plan for
the withdrawal of contractors and new corporate mercenary contracts are
being awarded. The SoFA Agreement between the US and Iraq gives the US the
right to extend the occupation indefinitely and to continue intervening
militarily in Iraq ad infinitum. All it takes is for the puppets in Baghdad
to ask nicely.--Jeremy Scahill, "Obama's Iraq:
The Picture of Dorian Gray," counterpunch.org, April 28, 2009]
[In his first 100 days, Obama has excused torture, opposed habeas corpus,
and demanded more secret government. He has kept Bush's gulag intact and at
least 17,000 prisoners beyond the reach of justice. On April 24, his lawyers
won an appeal that ruled Guantanamo prisoners were not "persons" and
therefore had no right not to be tortured. His national intelligence
director, Adm. Dennis Blair, says he believes torture works. One of his
senior officials in Latin America is accused of covering up the torture of
an American nun in Guatemala; another is a Pinochet apologist. As Daniel
Ellsberg has pointed out, America experienced a military coup under Bush,
whose secretary of "defense," Robert Gates, along with the same warmaking
officials, have been retained by Obama.--John Pilger, "Obama's First 100 Days: The Madmen Did
Well," antiwar.com, April 29, 2009]
[One would have thought that, following the jury's decision, the bar set by
the jury in the Al Arian case would be so high that the prosecution would
finally leave him alone. But there is apparently a difference between a
Palestinian patriot and Americans spying for Israel. One group has a
powerful lobby in Washington, and the other has nothing, except the urging
of that powerful lobby to go after any Palestinian activist with criminal
charges or anything else they can get their hands on.--James G. Abourezk,
"Where's the
Justice at the Justice Department?," counterpunch.org, May 4, 2009]
[ . . . ever since he was inaugurated, Obama has taken one extreme step
after the next to keep concealed both the details and the evidence of Bush's
crimes, including rendition, torture and warrantless eavesdropping.--Glenn
Greenwald, "Obama's
latest effort to conceal evidence of Bush era crimes," salon.com, May 13, 2009]
[His courting of Westernized Turkish generals, bowing to King Abdullah, and
joining Mubarak in a cheer for freedom will tell Muslims all they need to
know about U.S. intentions in their region. Likewise, Obama's expanding war
in Afghanistan and his kowtowing to Israel and American Israel-Firsters will
give the lie to his claim that Washington is now an honest broker in the
Middle East.--Michael Scheuer, "Obama Steers Toward Endless War With
Islam," antiwar.com, May 20, 2009]
[In reality, the United States used OPS to control the behavior of foreign
police for its own political ends. The goal of U.S. public safety programs
was to unify a country's police and military under a central command -
overseen by OPS advisors. Assassination, disappearance and torture were the
tools of the OPS trade.--Jeremy Bigwood, "Reinventing
Demons: The Obama administration plans a new round of 'public
safety' programs in Latin America," inthesetimes.com, May 21, 2009]
[Parts of his plan would threaten the very foundation of our legal system -
that no one should be held in custody if he has committed no
crime.--Marjorie Cohn, "Obama's
Guantanamo Appeasement Plan," truthout.org, May 27, 2009]
[Not only did Obama keep on Robert Gates as defense secretary; he retained
the secretary of the Army, Pete Geren - another star of the Christian Embassy
video, who also, in commencement remarks at West Point last year,
characterized America's wars in Iraq and Afghanistan as struggles for
religious freedom against the "darkness and oppression" of radical Islam - and
also appointed as his national security adviser the retired Marine general
James Jones, a regular on the prayer breakfast circuit. Nobody believes the
new president shares Bush's religious sentiments, but clearly he is willing
to shave constitutional protections in exchange for evangelical peace.--Jeff
Sharlet, "Jesus
killed Mohammed: The crusade for a Christian military," Harpers, May
2009]
[ . . . what we're seeing, under President Barack Obama, is sort of old wine
in a new bottle. Obama is sending one message to the world, but the reality
on the ground, particularly when it comes to private military contractors,
is that the status quo remains from the Bush era. Right now there are 250
thousand contractors fighting the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. That's about
50 percent of the total US fighting force. Which is very similar to what it
was under Bush. In Iraq, President Obama has 130 thousand contractors. And
we just saw a 23 percent increase in the number of armed contractors in
Iraq. In Afghanistan there's been a 29 percent increase in armed
contractors. So the radical privatization of war continues unabated under
Barack Obama.--"Bill
Moyers Journal, Jeremy Scahill," pbs.org, June 5, 2009]
[Like any other president before him, . . . President Obama is not going to
limit his presidential powers when it comes to this draconian absolute
executive power.--Sibel Edmonds, "The Battle
Against the State Secrets Privilege," counterpunch.org, June 9, 2009]
[President Obama justifiably reminded his audience at the National Archives
that the last administration left the country with a terrible, and terribly
complicated, legal mess. His personal commitment to the rule of law cannot
be doubted. Nonetheless, unless his administration explains why specific
cases cannot be prosecuted in the federal courts, it will have done no
better than its predecessor on a pivotal threshold issue.--Eugene R. Fidell,
"The
Trouble With Tribunals," New York Times, June 13, 2009]
[ . . . administration attorneys repeatedly adopt the executive-authority
and national-security rationales that their Republican predecessors
preferred.--Michael Doyle, "In stark legal
turnaround, Obama now resembles Bush," McClatchy Newspapers, June
19, 2009]
[Since 1945, by deed and by example, the US has overthrown 50 governments,
including democracies, crushed some 30 liberation movements
. . . while liberals now celebrate America's return to its "moral ideals",
they are silent on a venerable taboo. This is the true role of Americanism:
an ideology distinguished by its myths and the denial that it exists.
President Obama is its embodiment.--John Pilger, "Mourn on the fourth
of July," johnpilger.com, July 9, 2009]
[Hence Biden and Clinton's mutinies, conducted on behalf of the Israel lobby
and designed to seize administration policy as Obama's popularity weakens. .
. . As Thalheimer's Law decrees. All policy is domestic.--Alexander
Cockburn, "The Biden and
Clinton Mutinies," counterpunch.org, July 31, 2009]
[He wants the nation's banks to be prohibited from owning and trading risky
securities, the very practice that got the biggest ones into deep trouble in
2008. And the administration is saying no, it will not separate commercial
banking from investment operations.--Louis Uchitelle, "Volcker Fails to Sell a Bank Strategy," New York Times, October
20, 2009]
[The Obama administration has clung for so long to the Bush administration's
expansive claims of national security and executive power that it is in
danger of turning President George W. Bush's cover-up of abuses committed in
the name of fighting terrorism into President Barack Obama's
cover-up.--Editorial, "The
Cover-Up Continues," New York Times, October 26, 2009]
[Farhana Khera, president of Muslim Advocates, said the F.B.I. was harassing
Muslim-Americans by singling them out for scrutiny.--Charlie Savage, "Loosening of F.B.I. Rules
Stirs Privacy Concerns," New York Times, October 29, 2009]
[Once a person has been named an enemy combatant, according to the Bush
Administration - and now to the Obama Administration - he has no rights. He
can be held without charges forever, tortured, you name it - well, actually,
the president or the secretary of defense names it.
In the second covert executive order, Bush authorized the CIA to target and
assassinate said "enemy combatants" - again, including American
citizens.--Ted Rall, "OBAMA'S REAL DEATH PANELS," yahoo.com, October 27, 2009]
[Obama is already set on the course to a one-term presidency. He promised
change, but has delivered none.--Paul Craig Roberts, "The Evil
Empire," counterpunch.org, November 6, 2009]
[ . . . as the investigations into Blackwater deepen and the scandals
expand, perhaps the most urgent question is this: why does President Obama
continue to use this company?--Jeremy Scahill, "The Blackwater plot
deepens," Guardian, November 11, 2009]
[President Barack Obama's appointee to head the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs advocated "cognitive infiltration" of groups that
advocate "conspiracy theories" like the ones surrounding 9/11.--Daniel
Tencer, "Obama staffer wants 'cognitive infiltration' of 9/11 conspiracy
groups," rawstory.com, January 13, 2010]
[An Associated Press examination of 17 major agencies' handling of FOIA
requests found denials 466,872 times, an increase of nearly 50% from the
2008 fiscal year under Bush.--Andrew Malcolm, "A little secret about Obama's
transparency," latimes.com, March 21, 2010]
[Senator Obama promised repeatedly in the 2008 campaign to reverse Mr.
Bush's many abuses of power. This was one of them. President Obama should
read this court ruling with chagrin and eliminate warrantless spying. It is
also far past time to stop hiding behind spurious, often ludicrous, claims
of national security.--Editorial: "We Can't
Tell You," New York Times, April 3, 2010]
[In short, the government is attempting to criminalize the organizing of
antiwar protests.--Ron Jacobs, "We've Been Here
Before: The FBI Raids in Context," counterpunch.org, September 27,
2010]
[Bush employed drone strikes 45 times in his eight years as president. In
Obama's first year in office, the drones were sent in 53 times.--Fatima
Bhutto, "Pakistan
elites turn blind eye to war," atimes.com, December 11, 2010]
[The Bush administration's "targeted killing" program has been radically
expanded to include Americans far from any war zone. . . .
[Never before has an American President's fear of offending the Zionist
lobby and its stooges in Congress been so exposed as it was by Obama's
decision to veto the Security Council resolution condemning continued,
illegal Israeli settlement activities on the occupied West Bank--Alan
Hart, "The Veto and the Case for Impeaching President Obama," ICH,
February 21, 2011]
[Line up Obama with his fellow assassins, from Eisenhower through Bush, and
I believe he's the most repellent of the bunch, down there with Woodrow
Wilson. None of his rivals quite match the instinctive egotism that allows
Obama effortlessly to affect the earnestness of a man taking the moral high
road while executing a cynical program of
electioneering-by-assassination.--Alexander Cockburn, "Hairy-Chested
Liberals Exult: Big Question, Who Do We Kill Next?,"
counterpunch.org, May 13, 2011]
[The New Yorker magazine reports, the Obama administration has used the
Espionage Act of 1917 to press criminal charges in five alleged instances of
national security leaks - more such prosecutions than have occurred in all
previous administrations combined. Gabriel Schoenfeld of the Hudson
Institute said, "Ironically, Obama has presided over the most draconian
crackdown on leaks in our history - even more so than Nixon."--"Inside Obama's
'Orwellian World' Where Whistleblowing Has Become Espionage: The Case of
Thomas Drake," democracynow.org, May 18, 2011]
[An administration voted into office by a populace tired of George W.
Bushism has, remarkably enough, added on to Bush's wars, redoubled his
"secret" drone campaigns, further expanded the special operations forces
that have grown into a secret military inside the military, upped the level
of secrecy that envelops the National Security Complex (whose further
expansion it also has overseen), renewed the PATRIOT Act, supported further
surveillance of Americans, dumped yet more money into the Pentagon, and in
sum seems intent on recreating Bushism without Bush.--Karen J. Greenberg and
Tom Engelhardt, "Taking the Justice Out
of the Justice System," tomdispatch.com, August 22, 2011]
[By continually lying about the extent of the country's corruption problems,
they're adding fraud to fraud and raising such a great bonfire of lies that
they probably won't ever be able to fix the underlying mess.--Matt Taibbi,
"Obama and Geithner: Government,
Enron-Style," rollingstone.com, December 20, 2011]
[Ahmadinejad essentially was predicting that Israel's rule over Jerusalem
would eventually come to an end, much like the once mighty Soviet Union
collapsed in the early 1990s.--Elizabeth Murray, "How Obama Recycled a Lie about Iran," consortiumnews.com,
April 25, 2012]
[On his watch, six whistleblowers have been charged under the Espionage Act
for allegedly mishandling classified information. That is twice as many as
all past presidents combined.--"Blowing the whistle on Obama's America,"
aljazeera.com, June 9, 2012]
[In his inaugural address, Obama promised "not only to create new jobs, but
to lay a new foundation for growth." He promised to "build the roads and
bridges, the electric grids, and digital lines that feed our commerce and
bind us together." He promised to "restore science to its rightful place and
wield technology's wonders to raise health care's quality and lower its
cost." And he promised to "transform our schools and colleges and
universities to meet the demands of a new age." Unfortunately the
president's scorecard on every single one of those bold pledges is
pitiful.--Niall Ferguson, "Obama's Gotta Go,"
thedailybeast.com, August 19, 2012]
[1) Health care, in which Obama savaged the single-payer system, thus
preparing the way for the same on the public option, meanwhile silencing, or
rather, delegitimating all dissident voices, at the same time as exempting
health insurers from antitrust prosecution and favoring Big Pharma; 2) Civil
liberties, a good litmus test of democratic governance, in which Obama's
Department of Justice argued against granting habeas corpus rights to
detainees, invoked the Espionage Act against whistleblowers, carried
surveillance beyond that of previous administrations, with the National
Security Agency one of the culprits practicing the black magic of
eavesdropping, while renditions and Òblack holesÓ continue and even agencies
like FDA spy on its employees; 3) militarism, from which foreign policy,
including trade policy, cannot be excluded, in which the droneÐas Obama's
signature weaponÐterrorizes whole populations reeking destruction from the
skies, naval power displayed from the South China Sea to the Mediterranean,
a whole new generation of nuclear weapons in the pipeline (exempt from
potential budgetary sequestration), a military budget itself second to none,
and what appears to be a permanent state of war; 4) the omissions, which by
their absence speak volumes about the purposes and policies of his
administration, in which job creation and foreclosures have not been
addressed, climate change, wholly disappeared, gun control, nonexistent,
poverty never, never mentioned, and business and banking regulation the
compounding of phoniness on phoniness, not unexpected considering Obama's
belief in deregulation and bringing in the Clinton-Rubin crowd of free
marketeers.--Norman Pollack, "America on the Cusp of Fascism: Under the Cloak of Liberalism,"
counterpunch.org, October 12, 2012]
Irish Politician Blasts President Obama, Calling Him A War Criminal, June 20, 2013
[This is the same Obama who promised to close the Guantanamo Torture Prison, but did
not; the same Obama who promised to tell us the purpose for Washington's decade-long
war in Afghanistan, but did not; the same Obama who promised to end the wars, but
started new ones; the same Obama who said he stood for the US Constitution, but
shredded it; the same Obama who refused to hold the Bush regime accountable for its
crimes against law and humanity; the same Obama who unleashed drones against civilian
populations in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Yemen; the same Obama who claimed and
exercised power to murder US citizens without due process and who continues the Bush
regime's unconstitutional practice of violating habeas corpus and detaining US citizens
indefinitely; the same Obama who promised transparency but runs the most secretive
government in US history.--Paul Craig Roberts, "Stasi in the White House," opednews.com, June
21, 2013]
[Barack Obama offered himself as an outsider, a new kind of political figure, who would
challenge the prevailing forces of corporate thievery and military adventurism. In the
end, he proved to be their unapologetic agent.--Jeffrey St. Clair, "The Tragedy
of Barack Obama, the President Who Wouldn't Stand His Ground," theguardian.com,
January 2, 2015]