by James Bennet
			
			
			JERUSALEM, April 14 -- By throwing his support on Wednesday behind an Israeli
			plan to withdraw from the Gaza Strip, President Bush provided diplomatic
			assurances that represented a victory for Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.
			
			Mr. Sharon wanted three commitments: backing for the Gaza withdrawal,
			American recognition that Israel would hold on to parts of the West Bank,
			and an American rejection of the right of millions of Palestinian refugees
			from the Arab-Israeli war of 1948 and their descendants to return to their
			lands in what is now Israel. He got them all by promising to trade something
			Israelis overwhelmingly do not want any more: the Gaza settlements and a
			handful of settlements in the West Bank. And he got them without having to
			negotiate with the Palestinians.
			
			Palestinian officials knew that Israel strongly opposed yielding the whole
			West Bank or accepting the "right of return," and they had explored
			compromises in the past. But they relied on both demands as formidable
			negotiating levers. Mr. Bush has now moved to pluck both from their hands.
			
			"Imagine if Palestinians said, 'O.K., we give California to Canada,'" said
			Michael Tarazi, a legal adviser for the Palestine Liberation Organization.
			"Americans should stop wondering why they have so little credibility in the
			Middle East."
			
			For the first time in American diplomacy in the Middle East, Mr. Bush
			announced that major Jewish settlements on the West Bank had achieved the
			status they aimed for: rooted "facts on the ground," . . .
			
			For Israel, the risk is that the Palestinians will now reject as imposed on
			them any peace plan along the lines Mr. Bush laid out, . . .
			
			FULL TEXT
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			"Sharon's Herzliyah Speech ,"
			December 18, 2003
			
			
			Wafa Amr, "Furious Palestinians Reject Bush Pledges to Israel," Reuters,
			April 14, 2004
			
			
			Judy Dempsey and Heba Saleh, "EU warns US-Israel
			plan will hit peace hopes," Financial Times, April 15, 2004
			
			
			Tim Reid, "Leaders
			attack new twist in the Israel road map," The Times, April 16, 2004
			
			
			Robert Fisk, "Sharon's 'Courageous'
			Plan: Bush Legitimizes Terrorism," The Independent, April 16, 2004
			
			
			"Hamas
			chief killed in air strike," BBC News, April 17, 2004
			
			
			Eric Margolis, "Bush makes peace with 
			Sharon," ericmargolis.com, April 19, 2004
			
			
			"Letter
			to President Bush from Former U.S. Diplomats," April 30, 2004 
			
			
			Suzanne Goldenberg, "Former
			diplomats attack Bush: White House accused of sacrificing credibility with
			Arab world in US protest that mirrors assault on Blair," The Guardian,
			May 4, 2004 
			
			
			[When referring to Palestinian conditions, what we find is that reports of
			casualties, house demolitions, and dispossession in these media outlets
			pertain to specific cases and not to general patterns. Incidentally, the
			opposite is true when there  is an incident of Palestinian violence--Paul de
			Rooij, "The  Scale
			of the Carnage: Palestinian  Misery in Perspective," CounterPunch, June
			3, 2004]
			
			
			James Brooks, "How
			 Israel "Disperses" Demonstrations: Chemical  Warfare on the West
			Bank?," CounterPunch, July 5, 2004
			
			
			Conal Urquhart, "US deal
			'wrecks Middle East peace'," Guardian, August 23, 2004
			
			
			["The significance of the disengagement plan is the freezing of the peace
			process," . . . it is no secret that Ariel Sharon dreams of forcing all the
			Palestinians to Jordan,--Georgia Anne Geyer, "SHARON ADVISER REVEALS ISRAEL'S TRUE PLAN FOR PALESTINIANS," UPI,
			October 12, 2004]
			
			
			
			
			
	
	
	