by Enver Masud
			
			Israel does not have a written constitution. The British do not have
			a written constitution. The U.S. constitution provided few benefits
			for the majority of Americans for over 150 years. So why must the
			Iraqis wait for a new constitution before the U.S. occupation force
			transfers power to them? 
			
			Iraq's original constitution, together with the widely misunderstood
			Shariah (Islamic law derived
			from the Quran and other sources), provide a reasonable basis
			for Iraqi self rule -- at least until the Iraqis themselves draft
			and approve a new constitution.
			
			ISRAELI CONSTITUTION
			
			Israel, touted as the region's sole democracy, has not had a written
			constitution since its founding in 1948. Its political system is
			based upon its Declaration of Independence and various laws. The 
			following texts are "recognized as constitutional by Israel's Supreme 
			Court":
			
			
			- Declaration of Independence (1948) 
			
- Law of Return (1950) 
			
- World Zionist Organization -- Jewish Agency (Status) Law 
			
- Basic Laws: The Knesset (1958); Israel Lands (1960); The
			President of the State (1964); The Government (1968); The State
			Economy (1975); Israel Defense Forces (1976); Jerusalem, Capital of
			Israel (1980); The Judicature Law (1984); The State Comptroller
			(1988); Human Dignity and Freedom (1992); Freedom of Occupation
			(1992)
			
			
			Israel is of course a Jewish state -- it makes no separation between Church
			and state. Dr. Uri Davis, author of "Israel: 
			An Apartheid State," compares Israeli treatment of its Christian and
			Muslim citizens to South Africa's treatment of "blacks" during apartheid. 		
			
			BRITISH CONSTITUTION
			
			The British Constitution is also unwritten. It has two basic
			principles: the Rule of Law, and the Supremacy of Parliament. It is
			derived from a variety of sources, the primary ones are:
			
			
			- Statutes such as the Magna Carta of 1215 and the Act of Settlement
			of 1701 
			
- Laws and Customs of Parliament; political conventions 
			
- Case law -- constitutional matters decided in a court of law 
			
- Constitutional experts who have written on the subject
			
			
			Britain maintains a formal relationship between Church and state.
			The Queen is the United Kingdom's Head of State. Her role, stated in
			the Preface to the 39 Articles of the Church of England, describes
			the monarch as 'being by God's Ordinance, according to Our just
			Title, Defender of the Faith and ... Supreme Governor of the Church
			of England'.
			
			According to the official web site of the British Monarchy:
			"Archbishops and bishops are appointed by The Queen on the advice of
			the Prime Minister, who considers the names selected by a Church
			Commission. They take an oath of allegiance to The Queen on
			appointment and may not resign without royal authority."
			
			U.S. CONSTITUTION
			
			The U.S. has a written constitution which was first drafted and approved in
			1787. Over the next four years ten amendments, and a Bill of Rights, were
			approved. However, under this constitution Native Americans, women, whites
			who did not own property, African Americans, and other minorities had no
			voting rights.
			
			All white males were granted the right to vote by 1860. Women were
			granted the right to vote in 1920. In the 1960s African Americans
			were still fighting for the right to vote which, while granted by
			law, was denied to them in a variety of ways. President Bush owes
			his election to poor white and African American voters wrongfully
			struck from voter rolls in the state of Florida. Florida's governor
			is Jeb Bush, brother of President Bush.
			
			IRAQ CONSTITUTION
			
			Iraq had a written constitution. Prior to the U.S. invasion of Iraq a task force of
			Iraqi expatriates, formed by the U.S. Department of State, concluded that it
			would be a relatively simple matter to remove the decrees issued by
			President Saddam Hussein, and thereby restore the original Iraq
			constitution.
			
			Under their original constitution Iraqi's enjoyed a high standard of
			living, women's rights, and the highest literacy rate among the
			Arabs.
			
			Noah Feldman, a professor at New York University Law School, was
			appointed in May 2003 to the U.S. Office for Reconstruction and
			Humanitarian Assistance as an adviser on framing a new constitution
			for Iraq. "He's got substance in both an Islamic background and in
			practical constitutionalism," said David H. Souter, the Supreme
			Court justice for whom Professor Feldman had been a law clerk. His
			book, "After Jihad: America and the Struggle for Islamic
			Democracy," is a thoughtful examination of Islam and democracy.
			Mr. Feldman resigned two months later.
			
			Isam al-Khafaji, one of 140 Iraqis on the council formed by the U.S.
			to help with the postwar reconstruction and rehabilitation, also
			resigned. "I feared my role with the reconstruction council was
			sliding from  what I had originally envisioned -- working with
			allies in a democratic fashion -- to collaborating with occupying
			forces," he said.
			
			ISLAMIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
			
			Properly interpreted, the Shariah provides the principles for
			creating a just society. Democracy, human rights, the separation of
			"Church" and State, the rights of minorities, etc. were all
			recognized by Islamic jurists.
			
			In a major speech His Royal Highness, HRH Prince Charles, stated:
			
			
			"Islamic countries like Turkey, Egypt, and Syria gave women the vote
			as early as Europe did its women -- and much earlier than in
			Switzerland! In those countries women have long enjoyed equal pay,
			and the opportunity to play a full working role in their societies.
			The rights of Muslim women to property and inheritance, to some
			protection if divorced, and to the conducting of business, were
			rights prescribed by the Quran twelve hundred years ago, even if
			they were not everywhere translated into practice. In Britain at
			least, some of these rights were novel even to my grandmother's
			generation!"
			
			Two of the largest Muslim countries, Indonesia with a population of
			231 million, and Bangladesh with a population of 133 million, are
			led by women.
			
			As for separation of Church and state, centuries before the
			Europeans, Islamic jurists recognized a conceptual separation (Islam
			has no "Church", i.e. an hierarchy of priests, bishops, etc.).
			Islamic jurists divided the Shariah into two categories: religious
			observances and worldly matters. The first were beyond the scope of
			modification. The second which covered criminal law, family law, and
			transactions were deemed subject to interpretation.
			
			Regarding democracy the London based Impact International monthly
			reported that Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah (founder of
			Pakistan), stressed time and again that there was no need to borrow
			the concept or practice of democracy from others because Muslims had
			learnt democracy 1300 years ago. Mr. Jinnah believed that as the
			Prophet signed pacts with the Christians, Jews and other minorities
			in Madinahal-Munnawwarah, minorities would enjoy equal rights in
			Muslim countries.
			
			Replying to a question whether Pakistan would be a secular or theocratic
			state? the Quaid rebuked: "You are asking me a question that is absurd. What
			I have already said is like throwing water on a duck's back. When you talk
			of democracy, I am afraid you have not studied Islam. We learned democracy
			13 centuries ago."
			
			Of course, as in many non-Muslim countries, neither their faith nor
			their constitution were sufficient to prevent some Muslim leaders
			from doing more harm than good.
			
			A PRETEXT
			
			So why must Iraqis wait for a new constitution to secure their
			independence from the U.S. occupation force? The drafting of the
			constitution is a pretext for exploiting Iraq's national wealth,
			providing oil and water to Israel, and maintaining control of the
			energy resources of the Middle East.
			
			The U.S. is secretly building two giant intelligence facilities in
			Iraq at a cost of some half a billion dollars, according to a report
			in Israel's DEBKA-Net-Weekly. U.S. engineering and construction units
			are  setting up what amounts to an "intelligence city" on a site
			north of  the oil city of Mosul in Kurdistan and a second facility
			in  Baghdad's Saadun district on the east bank of the Tigris.
			DEBKA-Net-Weekly military experts infer from the "vast dimensions of
			the two projects and their colossal expense" that it is Washington's
			intention to retain a large U.S. military presence in Iraq for at
			least a decade.
			
			On August 26 Scotland's national newspaper reported, "The United
			States has asked Israel to explore reviving a pipeline route pumping
			oil from Iraq direct to the oil refineries in the Israeli port of
			Haifa. The office of the Israeli prime minister, Ariel Sharon, sees
			the pipeline project as a 'bonus' in return for Israel's backing of
			the US-led campaign in Iraq, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported
			yesterday."
			
			Stephen C. Pelletiere, writing in the New York Times, stated, "In
			the 1990's there was much discussion over the construction of a
			so-called Peace Pipeline that would bring the waters of the Tigris
			and Euphrates south to the parched Gulf states and, by extension,
			Israel. No progress has been made on this, largely because of Iraqi 
			intransigence. With Iraq in American hands, of course, all that
			could change."
			
			To fulfill Israeli expectations, and those of American corporations,
			Iraq can expect the U.S. Agency for International Development,
			assisted by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World
			Bank, to push for a restructuring of Iraq's economy. U.S. Defense
			Secretary Rumsfeld has begun promoting privatization as a good idea
			for Iraq's ailing economy.
			
			Mr. Rumsfeld's plan for Iraq is the first step of the Assistance
			Strategy prepared for developing nations. Each nation's finance
			minister is handed a 'restructuring agreement' pre-drafted for his
			'voluntary' signature, then, says Joseph Stiglitz (recipient Nobel
			Prize, Chairman, President's Council of Economic Advisers, Chief
			Economist, World Bank), the Bank hands every minister the same
			four-step program.
			
			Investigative journalist Gregory Palast who interviewed Dr. Stiglitz
			describes the Assistance Strategy: Step One is Privatisation which
			Stiglitz says could more accurately be called, 'Briberisation.' "You
			could see their eyes widen" at the prospect of 10% commissions paid
			to Swiss bank accounts for simply shaving a few billion off the sale
			price of national assets.  Step Two is 'Capital Market
			Liberalization.' In theory, capital market deregulation allows
			investment capital to flow in and out. Unfortunately, as in
			Indonesia and Brazil, the money simply flowed out and out. Step
			Three is Market-Based Pricing, a fancy term for raising prices on
			food, water and cooking gas. Step Four is Free Trade by the rules of
			the World Trade Organization and World Bank.
			
			Dr. Stiglitz likens this "free trade" to the Opium Wars of the
			mid-19th century in which Great Britain went to war with China to
			force open its markets, and took Hong Kong as the price for ceasing
			hostilities.
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
			Enver Masud, "Corporate
			Globalization Threatens World's Poor, Middle Class," The Wisdom
			Fund, October 10, 2000
			
			
			Enver Masud, "Deregulation
			Fiasco, Red Flag for Developing Countries," The Wisdom Fund,
			February 5, 2001 
			
			
			Enver Masud, "A Clash Between Justice and
			Greed, Not Islam and the West," The Wisdom Fund, September 2, 2002
			
			
			[I understand that because of your invasion of Kuwait in 1990, 2.6
			million claims were filed with the United Nations Compensation
			Commission, about $151 billion in compensation sought has been
			resolved, and $44 billion has been awarded to the claimants. It is
			estimated that it would require 100 years of sanctions to pay off
			these claims. . . .
			
			I see a parallel between your invasion of Kuwait, and our invasion
			of your country.--Enver Masud, "An Open
			Letter to the People of Iraq," The Wisdom Fund, April 23, 2001]
			
			
			[The American-backed administration in Iraq has announced sweeping
			economic reforms, including the sale of all state industries except
			for oil.
			
			The surprise announcement by Iraqi Finance Minister Kamel al-Kilani
			dominated the second day of meetings organised by the International
			Monetary Fund in Dubai.--"Iraq
			adopts sweeping reforms," BBC News, September 21, 2003]
			
			[The initiative bore all the hallmarks of Washington's ascendant
			neoconservative lobby, complete with tax cuts and trade tariff
			rollbacks. It will apply to everything from industry to health and
			water, although not oil.
			
			But it is still likely to feed concerns that Iraq is being turned
			into a golden opportunity for profiteering by multinational
			corporations relying on their political connections.--Philip
			Thornton and Andrew Gumbel, "America puts Iraq up for sale," Independent (UK), 
			September 22, 2003]
			
			
			Mark Fineman, "Open
			Investment Policy Looks Like 'World Occupation' to Iraq
			Merchants," Los Angeles Times, September 23, 2003
			
			
			[IILG appears to be part of a carefully-constructed network aimed at
			channelling business into Iraq.
			
			Interestingly, the firm's website is not registered in Salem Chalabi's name
			but in the name of Marc Zell, whose address is given as Suite 716, 1800 K
			Street, Washington. That is the address of the Washington office of Zell,
			Goldberg &Co, which claims to be "one of Israel's fastest-growing
			business-oriented law firms", and the related FANDZ International Law Group.
			
			The unusual name "FANDZ" was concocted from "F and Z", the Z being Marc Zell
			and the F beingDouglas Feith.--Brian Whitaker, "Friends
			of the family," Guardian (UK), September 24, 2003]
			
			
			[A new curriculum for training an Iraqi army for $164 million. Five
			hundred experts, at $200,000 each, to investigate crimes against
			humanity. A witness protection program for $200,000 per Iraqi
			participant. A computer study for the Iraqi postal service: $54
			million.--Jonathan Weisman  and Juliet Eilperin, "Some Doubt Need For $20.3 Billion  For Rebuilding,"
			Washington Post, September 26, 2003]
			
			
			Rajiv Chandrasekaran, "Iraqis Call U.S. Goal on Constitution Impossible,"
			Washington Post, September 30, 2003
			
			
			Rajiv Chandrasekaran, "Shiite Demand to Elect Constitution's Drafters Could Delay
			Transfer of Power," Washington Post, October 21, 2003
			
			
			Joseph Stiglitz, "America
			preaches free markets, but at home it's a different story," Guardian,
			October 29, 2003
			
			
			[It means that the oil industry is magically exempt from liability
			for a vast range of things, including health and safety violations,
			child labour, minimum wage and other employment rights such as equal
			opportunity, consumer fraud, clean environment duties, and
			shareholder accountability, to name but a few.--Richard Calland, "A licence
			to loot," Mail & Guardian (South Africa), Wednesday, October 29,
			2003]
			
			
			[None of the $87 billion recently appropriated by Congress for
			reconstruction in Iraq will go to Iraqi workers or the unemployed -
			which now total about 70% of the population.--David Bacon, "
			Iraqis Denied Worker Rights Under U.S. Occupation," Democracy
			Now, Wednesday, October 30, 2003]
			
			
			Larry Margasak, "Report Links Iraq
			Deals to Bush Donations," Associated Press, October 30, 2003
	
			
			[Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) may be in breach of the 1907
			Hague Regulations and the Fourth Geneva Convention because CPA's
			Order 39 permitted full foreign ownership of a wide range of
			state-owned Iraqi assets, barring natural resources such as oil.
			
			International experts say foreign investors could face a wide range
			of legal problems in Iraq because Order 39 is "strictly contrary to
			the Iraqi constitution," according to Stephen Nelson, a partner at
			Squire, Sanders & Dempsey--Thomas Catan, "Iraq Business Deals May Be
			Invalid, Law Experts Warn," Financial 
			Times, October 30, 2003]
			
			
			Naomi Klein, "Iraq is Not America's to Sell,"
			The Guardian, November 7, 2003
			
			
			Robin Wright and Rajiv Chandrasekaran, "Alternatives to Iraqi Council Eyed," Washington Post,
			November 9, 2003
			
			
			Susan Sachs and Joel Brinkley, "Iraqi Leaders
			Seek Power Before Drafting a Charter," New York Times, November
			13, 2003
			
			
			[The religious edict, handed down in June by Grand Ayatollah Ali
			Sistani, Iraq's most influential Shiite Muslim cleric, called for
			general elections to select the drafters of a new
			constitution.--Rajiv Chandrasekaran, "How Cleric Trumped U.S. Plan for Iraq," Washington Post,
			November 26, 2003]
			
			
			[. . . privatisation is being imposed by bombing, looting, freezing
			of assets, random sacking of staff and exposure to unfair
			competition.--Kamil Mahdi, "Privatisation won't make you popular," Guardian, November 9,
			2003]
			
			
			Edward Wong, "Sunnis in Iraq Form Own Political Council," New York
			Times, December 26, 2003
			
			
			[Plans to privatize state-owned businesses . . . have been dropped over the
			past few months. So too has a demand that Iraqis write a constitution before
			a transfer of sovereignty.--Rajiv Chandrasekaran, "
			Attacks Force Retreat From Wide-Ranging Plans for Iraq," Washington
			Post, December 28, 2003]
			
			
			[The Bush administration has decided to let the Kurdish region remain
			semi-autonomous as part of a newly sovereign Iraq despite warnings from
			Iraq's neighbors and many Iraqis not to divide the country into ethnic
			states, American and Iraqi officials say.--Steven R. Weisman, "Kurdish Region in Northern Iraq
			Will Get to Keep Special Status," New York Times, January 5, 2004]
			
			
			[The reconstruction of Iraq has emerged as a vast protectionist racket, a
			neo-con New Deal that transfers limitless public funds - in contracts, loans
			and insurance - to private firms, and even gets rid of the foreign
			competition to boot, under the guise of "national security". . . .
			
			"If you take $10m from the US government and sub the job out to Iraqi
			businesses for a quarter-million, is that business, or is that corruption?"
			Naomi Klein, "The
			$500 billion fire sale," Guardian, January 17, 2004]
			
			
			[The occupation authorities are trapped. The occupation is costing $3.9bn a
			month. Politically, if they permit a democratic election they could get a
			government whose legitimacy is unchallengeable and which wants them out of
			the country. If they go for a rigged, Florida-style vote, it would be
			impossible to contain Shia anger and an armed resistance would commence in
			the south, raising the spectre of a civil war.--Tariq Ali, "How
			far will the US go to maintain its illegitimate primacy in Iraq?,"
			Guardian, February 14, 2004]
			
			
			[Simply put, no Iraqi government could survive without the American forces,
			according to American commanders.--Dexter Filkins, "Iraqis Say Deal on U.S. Troops
			Must Be Put Off," New York Times, February 23, 2004]
			
			
			Warren Hoge, "U.N. Chief Says Iraq Elections Could Be Held Within a Year," New York
			Times, February 24, 2004
			
			
			[Article 25 (A) - The Iraqi Transitional Government shall have exclusive
			competence in the following matters: foreign policy and diplomatic
			representation; negotiating, signing, and ratifying international treaties
			and agreements; formulating foreign economic and trade policy and sovereign
			debt policies;
			
			Article 59 (C) - Upon its assumption of authority, and consistent with Iraq's
			status as a sovereign state, the elected Iraqi Transitional Government shall
			have the authority to conclude binding international agreements regarding
			the activities of the multi-national force operating in Iraq under unified
			command pursuant to the terms of United Nations Security Council Resolution
			1511 (2003), and any subsequent relevant United Nations Security Council
			resolutions.--"LAW OF
			ADMINISTRATION FOR THE STATE OF IRAQ FOR THE TRANSITIONAL PERIOD,"
			Associated Press, March 8, 2004]
			
			
			[. . . he fell out with the Bush circle because he wanted free elections and
			rejected an imposed programme of privatisation.--David Leigh, "General
			Jay Garner sacked by Bush says he wanted early elections," Guardian,
			March 18, 2004]
			
			
			Jim Krane, "U.S. will retain power in Iraq after
			transfer of sovereignty," Associated Press, March 21, 2004
			
			
			Anthony Shadid, "Iraqi
			Cleric Intensifies Opposition to Interim Constitution," Washington Post,
			March 22, 2004
			
			
			[Three former RTI employees who worked on the project say that the company
			instead spent 90 percent of the money on expensive expatriate staff, gave
			out lots of advice and held lots of meetings, but did little to provide
			support for local community organizations or councils.--Pratap Chatterjee,
			"Democracy by the
			Dollars," CorpWatch, July 19, 2004]
			
			
			Pratap Chatterjee,
			"Iraq, 
			Inc.: A Profitable Occupation," Seven Stories Press (November 15, 2004)
			
			
			[The chairman of Transparency International, Peter Eigen, said that Iraq was
			"at risk of becoming the biggest corruption scandal in history" if strong
			anti-bribery measures were not put in place by the time that the remainder
			of the reconstruction money was spent.--Alan Beattie, "
			Anti-corruption drive short on real progress," Financial Times, March
			16, 2005]
			
			
			[The administration has harshly criticized the United Nations over hundreds
			of millions stolen from the Oil-for-Food Program under Saddam. But the
			successor to Oil-for-Food created under the occupation, called the
			Development Fund for Iraq, could involve billions of potentially misused
			dollars.--Michael Hirsh, "Follow the
			Money," Newsweek, April 4, 2005]
			
			
			[The United Nations has approved $52.5bn (£29.3bn) in compensation
			payments to Iraq's neighbours arising from its 1990-91 occupation of
			Kuwait.--"Iraq
			compensation put at $52.5bn," BBC News, July 1, 2005]
			
			
			[What is worse is that many of these compensation claims were fraudulent.
			The U.N. discovered some, others were overlooked and paid out. There was a
			claim from the government of Jordan for having helped transiting guest
			workers to go home for $8.2 billion U.S. dollars, 8.2. The U.N. in the end
			awarded $79 million, less than a percent of what was asked for. The Iraqi
			money was like a cow that one could milk eternally in order to please
			governments that need the money while Iraqis back home were dying in large
			numbers.--Hans Von Sponeck, "The Surge
			of Baghdad Should Become the Surge on Washington," democracynow.org,
			March 23, 2007]
			
			
			VIDEO: Joseph Stiglitz, "Trade Liberalization in
			Iraq Will Lead to Loss of Jobs"
			
			
			
			
			
Copyright © 2003 The Wisdom Fund - Provided that it is
			not edited, and author name, organization, and web address
			(www.twf.org) are included, this article may be printed in
			newspapers and magazines, and displayed on the Internet.
			
			