U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry's statement at the Munich Security Conference, that
Israel will face boycotts should negotiations with the Palestinians fail, is a
level-headed view of reality that the Israeli government chooses to continually ignore.
Two weeks ago, Denmark's Danske Bank, the country's largest, blacklisted Bank Hapoalim
over its role in financing settlement construction. A week ago, Holland's second largest
pension fund, PGGM, announced that it was divesting from Israel's five main banks, for
similar reasons. Last Thursday, Norway's Finance Ministry ordered the government pension
fund not to invest in the Israeli firms Africa Israel Investments and Danya Cebus.
Germany recently said it intends to condition a scientific cooperation agreement as well
as grants to Israeli high-tech companies on the exclusion of companies in the West Bank
or East Jerusalem. In July, the European Union Commission released new guidelines
forbidding EU organizations from providing grants or loans to Israeli organizations with
ties to settlements. Even the compromise achieved over Horizon 2020 is indicative of the
trend -- Israel is losing legitimacy in the eyes of many European states.
Instead of working toward an agreement with the Palestinians that would fundamentally
alter Israel's political status, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his cabinet are
trying to change the subject. It's embarrassing to hear Strategic and Intelligence
Affairs Minister Yuval Steinitz demand 100 million shekels for a public campaign against
the boycott movement. He doesn't understand that the problem is policy, not public
relations. Defense Minister Moshe Ya'alon's claim that "settlements aren't an obstacle
to peace," raises doubts over his ability to accurately perceive reality. Foreign
Minister Avigdor Lieberman, on the other hand, prefers to chastise his underlings for
saying the boycotts against Israel will only intensify, rather than addressing the
reasons for the boycotts.
The prime minister beats them all: Instead of welcoming Kerry as an ally, he publicly
quarrels with him and hints that the secretary of state is trying to pressure Israel to
"give up essential interests." Netanyahu refuses to understand that Israel's most
essential interest is ending the conflict, and that Kerry is a fair, dedicated, mediator
who needs the support of all parties in order to complete this complex process.
Netanyahu refuses to understand that now is the time for big decisions, not small
[Perhaps most significantly, BDS has challenged the two-state consensus of the
international community. In so doing it has upset the entire industry of Middle East
peace process nonprofit organisations, diplomatic missions and think tanks by
undermining their central premise: that the conflict can be resolved simply by ending
Israel's occupation of Gaza, East Jerusalem and the rest of the West Bank, leaving the
rights of Palestinian citizens of Israel and refugees unaddressed. . .