Presidency of Arab League Seeks To Bury Own Experts' Report
[Computer translated from French]
Since the outbreak of the events that have cast a dark shadow over Syria,
two interpretations stand in opposition to each other: for the West and
their Gulf allies, the regime crushed the popular revolution in blood, while
for Syria and its BRICS allies, the country is assailed by armed groups
coming from abroad.
To shed light on these events, the Arab League created an Observer Mission
composed of persons appointed by each Member State (except Lebanon which
declined to participate). This diversity of experts constituted a guarantee
against the possible manipulation of the outcome; their number (over 160)
and the duration of their mission (one month) would provide a much broader
picture than was previously available. To date, no other party can claim to
have conducted a survey as comprehensive and meticulous, and therefore can
not claim to know better the situation in Syria.
The Ministerial Committee of the Arab League, responsible for monitoring the
Arab Plan and composed of five League members out of the 22 (Algeria, Egypt,
Oman, Qatar, Sudan) ratified the observer mission report by 4 votes against
1 (that of Qatar) and decided to extend the mission by one month.
The problem is that the report confirms the version of the Syrian government
and demolished that of the West and the Gulf monarchies. In particular, it
demonstrates that there were no lethal crackdowns on peaceful demonstrators
and that all the commitments made by Damascus have been scrupulously
honored. It also validates the important fact that the country is in the
grips of armed groups, who are responsible for the death of hundreds of
Syrian civilians and thousands among the military, as well as for hundreds
of acts of terrorism and sabotage.
For this reason, Qatar now seeks to prevent the dissemination of the report
by any means. Indeed, it is a real bomb that could explode in Qatar's face
and against its communication device.
Qatar currently holds the Presidency of the League, not because it was its
turn, but because it bought that of the Palestinian Authority which would
have been next in line.
The presidency of the League has decided not to circulate the report of the
Observer Mission, nor to translate, and not even to post the original in
Arabic on its website. [Report now available in English]
The Wahhabi emirate is up against a huge risk. If by chance the Western
public were to gain access to the report, it is Qatar and its proxies that
could be held accountable in terms of democratic deficiencies and
involvement in the killing of people.
[When the over 160 monitors, after one month of enquiries, issued their
report ... surprise! The report did not follow the official GCC line - which
is that the "evil" Bashar al-Assad government is indiscriminately, and
unilaterally, killing its own people, and so regime change is in
order.--Pepe Escobar, "Exposed:
The Arab agenda in Syria," atimes.com, February 4, 2012]
["Of the three main sources for all data on numbers of protesters killed and
numbers of people attending demonstrations - the pillars of the narrative
- all are part of the 'regime change' alliance. The Syrian Observatory
of Human Rights, in particular, is reportedly funded through a Dubai-based
fund with pooled (and therefore deniable) Western-Gulf money (Saudi Arabia
alone has, according to Elliot Abrams allocated US$130 billion to 'palliate
the masses' of the Arab Spring).
What appears to be a nondescript British-based organization, the Observatory
has been pivotal in sustaining the narrative of the mass killing of
thousands of peaceful protesters using inflated figures, 'facts', and often
exaggerated claims of 'massacres' and even recently 'genocide'."--Alexander
Cockburn, "Truth and Fiction in the News
Business," counterpunch.org, February 10, 2012]
[For eleven months, the Western powers and the Gulf States have led a
campaign to destabilize Syria. Several thousand mercenaries infiltrated the
country. Recruited by agencies in Saudi Arabia and Qatar within the Sunni
extremist community, they came to Syria to overthrow the "Alawite usurper"
Bashar al-Assad and impose a Wahhabi-inspired dictatorship. They have at
their disposal some of the most sophisticated military equipment, including
night vision systems, communication centers, and robots for urban warfare.
Supported secretly by the NATO powers, they also have access to vital
military information, including satellite images of Syrian troop movements,
and telephone interceptions.--Thierry Meyssan, "End of
game in the Middle East," voltairenet.org, February 14, 2012]
[The new constitution would enshrine freedom of speech and worship and end
the current monopoly on power held by Assad's Baath party, which has ruled
for four decades.--Patrick J. McDonnell, "Amid violence, Syria's Assad sets date for vote on new
constitution," Seattle Times, February 15, 2012]
[The war in Libya was purportedly to save lives. In fact, the killing
intensified on all sides, including from Nato bombs. Estimates of the number
dead reach 30,000.--Kevin Ovenden, "Western intervention in Syria will do more harm than
good," Guardian, February 16, 2012]
[We are not in the business of forcing 'regime change'. Nor do we want to
get involved with arming the opposition forces in a country and violating
international law and trashing its national sovereignty.--M K Bhadrakumar,
"India's rethink on Syria is welcome,"
rediff.com, March 4, 2012]
Pierre Piccinin, "The
Syrian Mirage," counterpunch.org, March 6, 2012
[The omnipresent "Danny" from Syria has been recently exposed in a video
showing him relaxed, joking, and preparing off-camera staged- gunfire,
before getting into character for a hysterical "casualty report" given to
CNN's Anderson Cooper. "Danny" isn't the first fraud caught being used by a
duplicitous Western media to sell military intervention in Syria, therewas
also "Gay Girl in Damascus" who turned out to be a 40 year-old American man
based in the UK.--Tony Cartalucci, "Syria: Game Over for Western Propaganda,"
activistpost.com, March 6, 2012]
[The outrage expressed by politicians in the West and Gulf State and in the
mass media, about the 'killing of peaceful Syrian citizens protesting
injustice' is cynically designed to cover up the documented reports of
violent seizure of neighborhoods, villages and towns by armed bands,
brandishing machine guns and planting road-side bombs.--James Petras, "The
Bloody Road to Damascus: The Triple Alliance's War on a Sovereign
State," voltairenet.org, March 11, 2012]
[The House of Saud and Qatar have institutionalized that motley crew known
as the Free Syrian Army as a mercenary outfit; they are now on their
payroll, to the tune of $100 million (and counting). . . .
Not missing a beat, Washington has set up its own fund as well, for
"humanitarian" assistance to Syria and "non-lethal" aid to the "rebels";
"non-lethal" as in ultra battle-ready satellite communications equipment,
plus night-vision goggles. Clinton's silky spin was that the equipment would
allow the "rebels" to "evade" attacks by the Syrian government. No mention
that now they have access to actionable US intelligence via a swarm of
drones deployed all over Syria.--Pepe Escobar, "We want
war, and we want it now," atimes.com, August 6, 2012]
[Brookings Institution, "Assessing Options for Regime Change," p4:
"An alternative is for diplomatic efforts to focus first on how to end the
violence and how to gain humanitarian access, as is being done under Annan's
leadership. This may lead to the creation of safe-havens and humanitarian
corridors, which would have to be backed by limited military power. This
would, of course, fall short of U.S. goals for Syria and could preserve Asad
in power. From that starting point, however, it is possible that a broad
coalition with the appropriate international mandate could add further
coercive action to its efforts."--Tony Cartalucci, "NYT Insults Intelligence in Latest Syrian Op-Ed,"
landdestroyer.blogspot.com, April 10, 2012]
[The conclusion for this week: We now have three principal power forces
actively engaging each other across the region:
a) established conservative regimes that want to keep things as they are in
the Gulf and other Arab monarchies (led by the United States and the GCC);
b) established autocratic regimes that want to keep things as they are in
places like Syria, Egypt and Iran; and,
c) populist forces with democratic or Islamist tendencies that challenge
both of the first two forces and seek to usher in a new period of
democratic, accountable governance.--Rami G. Khouri, "The
Counter-Revolution Is in Full Swing," middle-east-online.com, April
10, 2012]
[That massacre was indeed appalling, and apparently the work of rogue
militias aligned with the regime. But in 1982, Bashar's father rolled his
artillery up to the gates of Hama and, to crush an insurrection by the
Muslim Brotherhood, fired at will into the city until 20,000 were
dead.--Patrick J. Buchanan, "Syria's Insurrection Is Not America's War,"
antiwar.com, June 5, 2012]
[But according to a new report in Germany's leading daily, the Frankfurter
Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ), the Houla massacre was in fact committed by
anti-Assad Sunni militants, and the bulk of the victims were member of the
Alawi and Shia minorities, which have been largely supportive of Assad. For
its account of the massacre, the report cites opponents of Assad--John
Rosenthal, "Report: Rebels Responsible for Houla
Massacre," nationalreview.com, June 9, 2012]