by Elias Davidsson
Approximately 20 minutes after the apparent aircraft crash on the South
Tower of the World Trade Center, before anyone expected further attacks,
President George W. Bush emerged from a school class in Florida where he
listened calmly to children read a story about a pet goat, and announced
that the United States was under attack. In his TV address he said: 'today
we've had a national tragedy. Two airplanes have crashed into the World
Trade Centre in an apparent terrorist attack on our country. Twenty-four
hours later the US Congress declared unanimously:
(a) That the events of the previous day had been 'attacks against' the
United States; (b) That terrorists had 'hijacked and destroyed' four
(c) That the attacks 'destroyed both towers of the World Trade Center'; and
(d) That the attacks clearly were intended 'to intimidate our Nation and
weaken its resolve.
The evidence available to the Congress at that time about the manner in
which the crime had been committed was hardly sufficient for the above
findings, and did not appear sufficiently reliable to allow the conclusion
to be drawn that foreign terrorists had been responsible for the crime.
Mass media published from the first hour horrid details about the events -
partly based on leaks from unidentified public and airline officials - and
speculative theories about the identities of the perpetrators and their
motives. The official account on 9/11 was established by political leaders
and the media within less than 48 hours of the attacks. . . .
"What Really Happened on September 11, 2001,"
The Wisdom Fund
Elias Davidsson, "There is no evidence that Muslims committed
the crime of 9/11," opednews.com, August 11, 2010