by Enver Masud
The contrast between the occupier and the occupied couldn't be more vivid -
one resides in palaces, the other often reside in bombed out homes or as
refugees within their own country.
In Saddam Hussein's birthplace - Tikrit, Iraq, the U.S. occupation force has
commandeered the former dictator's palaces to use as homes and offices for
the occupation force.
Local government's requesting to use these palaces as schools, libraries,
museums, hotels, etc., are being denied, and are angry at the Americans.
Of-course, the generals get the best rooms and lavish bathrooms (see slide
show). The privates sleep on cots and use portable latrines.
The occupation force lives in air-conditioned comfort, enjoys $64 lunches
with 22 flavors of ice cream - "better than those served at the University
of California". The caterer, Kellog Brown & Root - a subsidiary of
Halliburton (once run by Vice President Richard Cheney) - rakes in the
The occupation force has running water, electricity, and security -
all of which were promised to the Iraqi people. All of which they mostly had
under Saddam Hussein. All of which they have much less of under the U.S.
The Iraqis, of course, resent this - except for the few who have made it
into the inner circles of the occupation force.
Contracts are doled out to Iraqis in the inner circle - often these are the
interpreters. They get to lord it over more qualified firms and individuals,
thereby, alienating more Iraqis.
Outside their relatively secure enclaves the occupiers are targets of the
Iraqi resistance. For Americans killed or maimed, their palace quarters,
$60,000 in pay and allowances for the lowest private, and the promise of
$90,000 in loans for education become small compensation for them and their
families, but it is what draws them into the military.
Iraqis struggle just to feed their families, and live in fear of a knock on
the door late at night which may be the beginning of their disappearance
into the American
gulags in Iraq, Jordan, Pakistan, Diego Garcia, Guantanamo, and
And it isn't just in Tikrit, this vivid contrast between the occupier and
the occupied exists virtually all over Iraq.
Since there is no draft, the elites of America are largely untouched by the
mounting human tragedy: roughly 1600 Americans dead, 180 members of the
"coalition" dead, 100,000 Iraqis
dead, and countless more maimed or wounded.
Absent the American elite's personal stake in the war, mainstream media
debate - which the elite control - has become largely divorced from this
unnecessary human tragedy.
India's first prime minister Jawaharlal Nehru, in a letter to his daughter,
wrote about the British occupation of Iraq ("Iraq and the virtues of aerial
bombing," June 7, 1933):
"The novel feature of the modern
type of imperialism is its attempt to hide its terrorism and exploitation
behind pious phrases about 'trusteeship' and the 'good of the masses' and
'the training of the backward peoples in self-government' and the like."
Nehru's letters to his daughter Indira Gandhi - who became India's prime
minister in 1966 - were written from a British prison in India. Published
of World History", they should be required reading for the new
imperialists occupying Iraq today.
As Yogi Berra might have said: "It's deja vu all over again."
Mark Fineman, "Palace Being Renovated
for US Occupation," Los Angeles Times, May 9, 2003
Enver Masud, "Exploiting Iraq: $64 Lunch,
$125,000 Truck Driver," The Wisdom Fund, January 29, 2004
Scott Johnson, "Lost in the Green Zone: As Iraqi frustration mounts over
sovereignty, Americans have a place to dance and eat pizza," MSNBC,
Michael Meacher, "America is Usurping the
Democratic Will in Iraq," Independent, April 5, 2005
Bradley Graham, "Commanders Plan Eventual
Consolidation of U.S. Bases in Iraq," Washington Post, May 22, 2005
Military Occupation Facilities," GlobalSecurity.org
[ . . . biggest embassy on earth . . . cover an area larger than Vatican
City. . . . only big US building project in Iraq that is on time and within
budget.--Daniel McGrory, "Baghdad anger at Bush's undiplomatic palace," The Australian, May 4, 2006]
Rajiv Chandrasekaran, "Imperial Life in the Emerald City: Inside Iraq's Green Zone,"
Knopf (September 19, 2006)
[Rising from the dust of the city's Green Zone it is destined, at $592m
(£300m), to become the biggest and most expensive US embassy on earth when
it opens in September.--Ed Pilkington, "America's
fortress embassy," Guardian, May 21, 2007]
William Langewiesche, "The Mega-Bunker of Baghdad," Vanity Fair, November 2007
Howard LaFranchi, "Iraqis see red
as U.S. opens world's biggest embassy," Christian Science Monitor, April
[For Washington, the driving motivation is to create a "zone of influence"
around the new $700 million U.S. Embassy. The zone would serve as a kind of
high-end buffer for the compound, whose price tag will reach about $1
billion after all the workers and offices are moved over the next
year.--Bradley Brooks and Qassim Abdul-Zahra, "Green Zone
dreams of wealth to come," Associated Press, May 5, 2008]
[Last year, on a visit to LSA Anaconda, the largest US base in Iraq, I was
taken to one of its dining facilities that serves up to 1,000 people at a
sitting. It was run by Houston-based KBR, the former subsidiary of
Halliburton. Here's what KBR made available for an ordinary breakfast: baked
bacon, creamed beef, pork sausage patties, turkey sausage links, plain
omelets, scrambled eggs, hash browns, grits/oatmeal, buttermilk biscuits,
French toast, waffles, assorted yogurts, muffins, doughnuts, and coffee
cake.--Pratap Chatterjee and Tom Engelhardt, "The Military's
Expanding Waistline," TomDispatch Monitor, February 20, 2009]
Copyright © 2005 The Wisdom Fund -
Provided that it is not edited, and author name, organization, and web address
(www.twf.org) are included, this article may be printed in newspapers and
magazines, and displayed on the Internet.