by Enver Masud
Guided by the World Bank and other development agencies, countries
throughout Asia and Africa are deregulating and restructuring their
electric power sector, even as this prescription is causing havoc in
California--the world's sixth-largest economy.
Federal regulators in the United States say that California's
experiment in electricity deregulation has failed. "This version of
competition was a disaster," said Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Chairman James Hoecker--head of the U.S. government agency which
regulates wholesale power distribution--this past December.
High electricity costs and lack of supply have idled factories and
businesses from California to the Pacific Northwest. "Businesses are
being forced to choose between paying exorbitant power bills or
closing their doors," reports Reuters.
Southern California Edison told state officials it might begin to
ration electricity to its customers because it has no money to buy
more, reported the Washington Post.
The deregulation of California's electricity market--which along
with Norway, and the United Kingdom models, are recommended by the
World Bank and others to developing countries--was supposed to bring
cheaper electricity to the state. Instead, with wholesale electric
rates 10 to a 100 times higher than a year ago, California's largest
utilities face losses of over $8 billion. To avoid bankrupting the
utilities, the state Public Utilities Commission in San Francisco
approved emergency rate increases of between 7 and 15 percent.
Amidst fears that California utilities would be unable to pay
market prices, U.S. Energy Secretary, Bill Richardson, signed an
extraordinary, emergency order that would force out-of-state power
producers to supply electricity to California.
California's big three utilities--Southern California Edison,
Pacific Gas & Electric and San Diego Gas and Electric--serve about 27
million customers, buy their electricity through the Power Exchange
from different public and private producers, such as Houston-based
Enron Corporation, which critics charge are manipulating the
Enron denies the charge, saying it is merely a matter of supply
Five investigations into possible market manipulation by electric
supply companies are underway, and consumer groups are planning ballot
intiatives to reverse deregulation by putting the state in charge of
the power system or reregulating entirely, reports the Washington
In 1996, the electricity market in California was deregulated in
the hopes that market forces and competition would lead to cheaper
prices. Consumers were promised that rates would remain frozen until
But instead, the "free market" has wreaked havoc. No new major
power stations have been built while a booming, high-tech economy has
increased electricity demand. Since the summer of 2000, the state has
experienced frequent energy emergencies that required businesses to
limit electricity use.
Patricia Irwin, a professional engineer and editor in chief of
Electrical World magazine, in a full-page display in the Washington
Post, December 31, 2000, (apparently designed to calm growing
apprehension with deregulation) states that California's electric
power shortages are due "first" to the fact that "Utilities there had
built almost no new generating plants and very little in the way of
transmission capacity for a decade."
True, but Ms Irwin's statement, while explaining the cause of
California's electricity shortages, may point to a fatal flaw in
California's "deregulated" electric power industry. In a free market,
producers have a greater incentive to build in anticipation of supply
shortages, rather than when supply surpluses are anticipated. This was
not the case in California.
Until the rush to deregulation, the United States enjoyed very
high reliability of supply. That is changing under the new system. In
mid-December last year, the California Independent System Operator
warned that the state would experience rolling blackouts.
And "deregulation" itself is a misnomer. The new system is still
regulated, but in ways that provide electricity supply companies
greater opportunity for profits, where previously, these companies
were limited to recovering only their legitimate costs.
Energy Insight Today newsletter projects that Duke Energy's
revenues for the Moss Landing power plant--owned by Pacific Gas and
Electric prior to deregulation--will be $238 million for 2000,
compared with $49 million for 1999.
As for state Sen. Steve Peace, who took the lead in shaping
California's effort to deregulate the electricity industry, experts
say his political career is all but over. "He couldn't be elected
dogcatcher," said political consultant Ann Shanahan-Walsh.
During the next five years, electric power companies in the Middle
East are expected to add 92 gigawatts of new electric power generation
at a cost of around $60 billion. Countries such as China, India, and
Indonesia are also adding large amounts of new capacity. Unable to pay
for this new capacity, many of these countries have sought World Bank
and other loans, which come with requirements for deregulating
electricity markets, and restructuring the electric power sector.
In many developing countries, the electric sector consumes one-half
to three-quarters of the non-defense budget. California's deregulation
fiasco should serve as a red flag for developing countries.
[Mr. Enver Masud has 35 years
of industry, state government, federal government, and international
experience in the electric power sector. He managed the National Power
Grid Study, and National Electric Reliability Study, while employed at
the U.S. Department of Energy.]
["It accuses such power suppliers as Reliant Resources Inc., Williams Cos.,
Dynegy Inc., Mirant and Duke of withholding power to push up prices. It also
accuses a range of companies of executing strategies to boost profits by
misleading the marketplace. The strategies are similar to tactics that Enron
Corp., now under bankruptcy protection, employed,"--Jonathan Peterson and Nancy
Rivera Brooks, "Calif. Report Widens Blame in Energy Plot," Los Angeles
Times, March 3, 2003]
Greg Palast, "Power
Outage Traced to Dim Bulb in White House," August 15, 2003
Enver Masud, "To soon to call for grid
overhaul," Christian Science Monitor, August 18, 2003
Katherine Stapp, "Laissez-faire legacy leaves New York in the dark," Manila Times, August 23,
[. . . the state will help companies recover the cost of some of the long-term contracts
if they don't work out. That runs counter to the pure market theory underlying
deregulation, but at the moment it appears that the market alone will not provide for
New York's energy needs.--Editorial: "Power Shortage," New
York Times, March 18, 2004]
["What we need to do is to help in the cause of, ah, downfall of California," an
employee is heard saying on the tapes. "You guys need to pull your megawatts out of
California on a daily basis."--"More
Enron Tapes, More Gloating," CBS News, June 8, 2004]
Gene Johnson, "Enron gouged Western customers for at least $1.1 billion, public utility
says," Seattle Times, June 15, 2004
[Directed by Alex Gibney, this is the inside story of one of history's greatest business
scandals, in which top executives of America's 7th largest company walked away with over
one billion dollars while investors and employees lost everything.--VIDEO: "Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room,"
Magnolia Pictures, April 22, 2005]
Steven Mufson, "Energy Deregulation Comes Home to Roost," Washington Post, April 25,
[On July 14, 2005, Roosevelt's Public Utility Holding Company Act, bulwark of consumer
protection, was repealed by a Congress fattened with utility industry cash.--Greg
lights way for power predators," Seattle Post-Intelligencer, May 24, 2006]
[. . . even after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, when India's cooperation in the "war on
terror" was crucial, the Bush administration kept up its full-court press to get India
to pay Enron for a white-elephant power plant that the company had built in Dabhol,
The pressure on India went up the chain of command to Vice President Dick Cheney, who
personally pushed Enron's case, and to Bush himself, who planned to lodge a complaint
with India's prime minister. Post-9/11, one senior U.S. bureaucrat warned India that
failure to give in to Enron's demands would put into doubt the future functioning of
American agencies in India.
The NSC-led Dabhol campaign didn't end until Nov. 8, 2001, when the Securities and
Exchange Commission raided Enron's offices - and protection of Lay's interests stopped
being politically tenable. That afternoon, Bush was sent an e-mail advising him not to
raise his planned Dabhol protest with India's prime minister who was visiting
Washington. . . .
Bush personally joined the fight against imposing caps on the soaring price of
electricity in California at a time when Enron was artificially driving up the price of
electricity by manipulating supply. Bush's resistance to price caps bought Enron extra
time to gouge hundreds of millions of dollars from California's consumers.
Bush granted Lay broad influence over the development of the administration's energy
policies, including the choice of key regulators to oversee Enron's businesses. The
chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission was replaced in 2001 after he
began to delve into Enron's complex derivative-financing schemes.
Bush had his NSC staff organize that administration-wide task force to pressure India
to accommodate Enron's interests in selling the Dabhol generating plant for as much as
$2.3 billion.--Robert Parry, "Bush's Enron Lies,"
Consortium News, May 26, 2006]
[In the 1980s, he led a he led a team of U.S. military advisers to assist the
government of El Salvador in its campaign against Marxist guerrillas. . . . Paul
Wolfowitz, an old friend, called him up and asked him to serve as the senior
adviser to Iraq's electricity Ministry.--Rajiv Chandrasekaran, "Imperial Life in the Emerald City: Inside Iraq's Green
Zone," Knopf (September 19, 2006), p88]
Copyright © 2001 The Wisdom Fund -
Provided that it is not edited, and author name, organization, and web address
(www.twf.org) are included, this article may be printed in newspapers and
magazines, and displayed on the Internet.